W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > November 2003

Re: NEW Issue (5) - Using Concepts for subject-based indexing and cla ssification

From: NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:47:10 -0000
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <532631423.1068472030@ilrt-haako.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

& I've just noticed
http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/

--On 10 November 2003 13:44 +0000 "NJ Rogers, Learning and Research 
Technology" <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> Hi Alistair
>
>> AJM>> We could go with qualified dublin core, and recommend using
>> dc:subject.
>>
>> .....
>>
>> So in summary, I have suggested an approach to subject-based indexing
>> using thesaurus concepts that is entirely consistent with all variations
>> in the qualified dublin core approach. The question is, do we like dcq?
>>
>>
> Also, for content providers describing collection level data we might
> want to recommend:
>
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/schema/
>
> ?
>
> Nikki
>
> ----------------------
> NJ Rogers, Technical Researcher
> (Semantic Web Applications Developer)
> Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT)
> Email:nikki.rogers@bristol.ac.uk
> Tel: +44(0)117 9287096 (Direct)
> Tel: +44(0)117 9287193 (Office)
>
>



----------------------
NJ Rogers, Technical Researcher
(Semantic Web Applications Developer)
Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT)
Email:nikki.rogers@bristol.ac.uk
Tel: +44(0)117 9287096 (Direct)
Tel: +44(0)117 9287193 (Office)
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 08:48:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:45:08 UTC