- From: NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:47:10 -0000
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
& I've just noticed http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/ --On 10 November 2003 13:44 +0000 "NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology" <Nikki.Rogers@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi Alistair > >> AJM>> We could go with qualified dublin core, and recommend using >> dc:subject. >> >> ..... >> >> So in summary, I have suggested an approach to subject-based indexing >> using thesaurus concepts that is entirely consistent with all variations >> in the qualified dublin core approach. The question is, do we like dcq? >> >> > Also, for content providers describing collection level data we might > want to recommend: > > http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/schema/ > > ? > > Nikki > > ---------------------- > NJ Rogers, Technical Researcher > (Semantic Web Applications Developer) > Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT) > Email:nikki.rogers@bristol.ac.uk > Tel: +44(0)117 9287096 (Direct) > Tel: +44(0)117 9287193 (Office) > > ---------------------- NJ Rogers, Technical Researcher (Semantic Web Applications Developer) Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT) Email:nikki.rogers@bristol.ac.uk Tel: +44(0)117 9287096 (Direct) Tel: +44(0)117 9287193 (Office)
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 08:48:27 UTC