- From: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:43:06 -0700
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Cc: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAE=3Ky9_jvBjDi6L95CPdW3xP81qfc=wSoYo69hD1kfmna7w4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Fair enough. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote: > > On 27/03/18 18:06, Hugh Paterson III wrote: > > In general I think I am fine without coopting the value from permit. > However, In this whole process I am not seeing how the assertion of a badge > holder or credential token holder actually is verified. But the > verification of tokens I think is a separate assertion. > > That's a fair point, but we're not trying to duplicate what can be done > with Open Badges or what the Verifiable Claims WG > <https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/WG/> / Credentials Community Group > <https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/> will produce (in fact, we are > trying not to duplicate that). > > For non-verified assertions, a simple hasEOCredential (or whatever) > property of Person pointing to an EducationalOccupationalCredential may > suffice. When the output of the VCWG / CCG is know that could be converted > to schema.org and added to the range of hasEOCredential > > FWIW, to my mind all statements in schema.org are unverified assertions. > Me saying I have a PhD from Bristol University is just as open to challenge > as me saying my name Phil Barker. So I think the scope of verifying claims > goes way beyond Educational and Occupational Credentials. (A mediating type > of similar nature Role <http://schema.org/Role> that can be used with any > property might work, it think the wikidata data model works like that.) > > What is also unclear to me is how an institution who did previously offer > a creational and has since ceased can continue to advertise that they have > previously offered the credential but are now not doing business with that > token. If the offeredBy attribute is only going to exist for currently > offered courses/credentials then how is an institution supposed to model > past offerings? > > schema:Offer has a property availabilityEnds > <http://schema.org/availabilityEnds> which can be a date in the past. > > Phil > > > -- > > Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil > PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; > information systems for education. > CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education > technology. > > PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, > number SC569282. > CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in > England number OC399090 >
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2018 17:43:29 UTC