- From: Stuart Sutton <stuartasutton@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 05:58:05 -0700
- To: Bob Dolan <rdolan123@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACetQ6EyRL5EUMmaKs78OhSMwhSNDTsa1iibYLatRUYi4VHNAw@mail.gmail.com>
Bob, some credentials require the holder to go through a periodic renewal process to keep his or her credential valid. I think the reference to "renewal" means that there have been no proposals for new or reuse of schema.org properties to express this sort of requirement. The same for "maintenance" which I take to mean expression of how the credential itself is reviewed periodically for necessary updates etc. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Bob Dolan <rdolan123@gmail.com> wrote: > Issue 4 currently states "the actual renewal / maintenance requirements > aren't specified” — I’m not sure what this means. > > Bob > > On Mar 30, 2018, at 4:22 PM, Stuart Sutton <stuartasutton@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Phil, both validIn and validFor look straightforward. I'd hope we might > tweak the definition of validFor a bit more and instead of ". "...time > validity..." we use "...duration of validity..." > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Drafts for coverage and duration of validity are now on the wiki. >> https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Duration_for >> _which_an_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_valid >> >> https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Show_the_geo >> graphic_area_in_which_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_recognised >> >> Phil >> >> On 26/03/18 17:07, Hugh Paterson III wrote: >> >> Let's go for it! >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Picking up from the discussion about 'other requirements', Nate Otto >>> suggested we align with validFor <http://schema.org/validFor> from the >>> Permit <http://schema.org/Permit> type to express the period for which >>> an educational occupational credential is valid. This relates to our use >>> case that "having found a credential it should be possible to identify what >>> is required to renew or maintain the validity of that credential". >>> >>> We also have a use case to show the coverage of a credential, i.e. the >>> geographic area or jurisdiction for which the credential is valid, which >>> came up during our discussions on the language of a credential. The >>> validIn <http://schema.org/validIn> property from the Permit type would >>> cover this. >>> >>> So the proposal is that we adjust the expected domain of validFor and >>> validIn to include Educational Occupational Credentials, and modify the >>> definitions to refer to "permits and credentials". >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> validFor: http://schema.org/validFor >>> >>> Permit: http://schema.org/Permit >>> >>> validIn: http://schema.org/validIn >>> -- >>> >>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil >>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; >>> information systems for education. >>> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education >>> technology. >>> >>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, >>> number SC569282. >>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in >>> England number OC399090 >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil >> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; >> information systems for education. >> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education >> technology. >> >> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, >> number SC569282. >> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in >> England number OC399090 >> > > > > -- > Stuart A. Sutton, Metadata Consultant > Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Washington > Information School > Email: stuartasutton@gmail.com > Skype: sasutton > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 12:58:33 UTC