Re: EOCred: Coverage & renewal of credential

Issue 4 currently states "the actual renewal / maintenance requirements aren't specified” — I’m not sure what this means.

Bob

> On Mar 30, 2018, at 4:22 PM, Stuart Sutton <stuartasutton@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Phil, both validIn and validFor look straightforward. I'd hope we might tweak the definition of validFor a bit more and instead of ". "...time validity..." we use "...duration of validity..." 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk <mailto:phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>> wrote:
> Drafts for coverage and duration of validity are now on the wiki.
> https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Duration_for_which_an_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_valid <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Duration_for_which_an_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_valid>
> 
> https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Show_the_geographic_area_in_which_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_recognised <https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/wiki/Show_the_geographic_area_in_which_educational_/_occupational_credential_is_recognised>
> 
> Phil
> 
> On 26/03/18 17:07, Hugh Paterson III wrote:
>> Let's go for it!
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk <mailto:phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>> wrote:
>> Picking up from the discussion about 'other requirements', Nate Otto suggested we align with validFor <http://schema.org/validFor> from the Permit <http://schema.org/Permit> type to express the period for which an educational occupational credential is valid. This relates to our use case that "having found a credential it should be possible to identify what is required to renew or maintain the validity of that credential".
>> 
>> We also have a use case to show the coverage of a credential, i.e. the geographic area or jurisdiction for which the credential is valid, which came up during our discussions on the language of a credential. The validIn <http://schema.org/validIn> property from the Permit type would cover this. 
>> So the proposal is that we adjust the expected domain of validFor and validIn to include Educational Occupational Credentials, and modify the definitions to refer to "permits and credentials".
>> Comments?
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> validFor: http://schema.org/validFor <http://schema.org/validFor>
>> Permit: http://schema.org/Permit <http://schema.org/Permit>
>> validIn: http://schema.org/validIn <http://schema.org/validIn>
>> -- 
>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>
>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education.
>> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology.
>> 
>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology.
> 
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stuart A. Sutton, Metadata Consultant
> Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Washington 
>    Information School
> Email: stuartasutton@gmail.com <mailto:stuartasutton@gmail.com>
> Skype: sasutton
> 
>