- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:08:18 +0000
- To: public-eocred-schema@w3.org
- Message-ID: <a1d3c418-4f1c-46c8-81cf-189e36367da6@pjjk.co.uk>
Thanks for your comments Nate. Just a quick note now because it's getting to the end of Friday here... On 16/02/18 17:39, Nate Otto wrote: > > Maybe I changed my mind on using alignment, particularly because > AlignmentObject already has the "alignmentType" property, which > includes "educationalLevel" as an option. Let's not bring AlignmentObjects back in to the reckoning. The terms used for the alignmentType are essentially proxies for properties of the thing being described. You could think of educationalLevel as being a refinement of educationalAlignment, but done in a odd way as a property of the AlignmentObject. There has been a fair amount of discussion of this approach over the last couple of years, and I think there is a consensus that where possible it is better to have direct specific property - value relationships rather than using AlignmentObject to refine the meaning of a generic property. In short, taking educationalLevel out of the alignmentType and making a property of the thing being described was deliberate. Phil -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 18:08:43 UTC