Re: For EOWG Review -- Re: Translations status & upcoming work

Hi Shawn,

Thank you for outlining this update and the link to the mockup. It makes it
very clear to see where you are with everything and what it is you need
some feedback on from EO.

It is late on Thursday and I happened to be able to read this email. So to
respond, I am okay with this going on the agenda tomorrow as long as
Sharron is aware of it and also agrees to add it. If by tomorrow start time
she is not aware and agreeable, then I don't want it added. She may or may
not have concerns that I cannot think of at the moment, so would like for
that to happen.

I like how this is coming along. Have some small opinions, but really like
the simplicity that is coming out of it.

Thanks again for the email update.
Brent


Brent A. Bakken
Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
Psychometrics & Testing Services
Co-Chair Pearson Able
*Pearson*

512 202 1087
brent.bakken@pearson.com






On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:36 PM Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Brent & Sharron,
>
> Since we didn't get to the "translations update" agenda item yesterday,
> here's an update in e-mail.
>
> We didn't prototype the previous proposal because it didn't have
> sufficient support.
>
> After working through differing perspectives from W3C Team (including
> i18n) and EOWG contributors, I think we've come up with a solution that
> will effectively meet user needs and sufficiently address other issues.
> It's written up with a static mockup at:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_wiki_WAI-5FTranslations-234-5FDec-5Fproposal&d=DwICaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=v-L6X-ScaY5UKb-F-_zcuXdbPw2UYK_gaTG8R5d9h7U&m=hcU9VL9loKBQt3ZCNqaa9BcylPiGCNUeZNrsUPdLQ4g&s=qztNyrfxI9IWhLcCno2hC1OQhlqhdkwXBQJQiVdNsEY&e=
>
> I would like to get an OK from interested parties on the location of the
> lists & links asap so we can continue from prototype to development. (We
> could tweak the wording of things like "this page" later.) I'm waiting for
> an OK from one more W3C staff, which should come tonight. Then I would like
> to offer it to EOWG to review.
>
> The timing challenge is that I'd prefer not to wait until next week, yet I
> won't know until tonight if we've got the OKs so it makes sense to take it
> to EOWG. Some options:
> * Add it to the agenda for tomorrow with something like "(if ready)"
> * Don't add to tomorrow's agenda. When it's ready, add it to Work for This
> Week and send e-mail to EOWG list.
> I'm fine with whatever y'all think it best. Feel free to ping me in IRC or
> call if you want to discuss.
>
> ---
>
> Next things will be process for submitting translations, reviewing,
> handling updates, etc.. I'll let you know when that is sufficient thought
> through that it makes sense for EOWG to look at.
>
> Best,
> ~Shawn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/30/2018 12:13 PM, Shawn Henry wrote:
> > Hi Sharron & Brent,
> >
> > Ref:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_wiki_WAI-5FTranslations&d=DwICaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=v-L6X-ScaY5UKb-F-_zcuXdbPw2UYK_gaTG8R5d9h7U&m=hcU9VL9loKBQt3ZCNqaa9BcylPiGCNUeZNrsUPdLQ4g&s=uMGofWle_Yb0u9GFbpXs4HTvbzjCvz98wdKwuPSd3_o&e=
> >
> > Below is to record what we discussed in the Wednesday EO-Plan meeting,
> along with some additional info for your consideration.
> >
> > * Translations UI proposal from 7 November had show-stopper issues (that
> came in on 19 November).
> > * We came up with different proposal and options - written. Initial
> feedback showed confusion. Need to provide a mock-up in order for people to
> effectively review the proposal.
> > * Hope to have that mock-up early in December.
> > * Would like to finalize UI asap to get it going before Eric is off...
>
>