Re: Tools for eGovernance

Thanks a lot Owen
it does look 'beautiful', it renders well

I can see one possible use: when enough people have their vision in
strathml we can run a query to match 'like' people and organisations and
this could help us form collaborative clusters
using semantic similarity

Just a couple of thoughts:
-would it be good to have only one file/url per entity (istcs) so that when
I have to update the info, i can do so by updating only one file, and have
all other instances automatically import the refreshed file every so often

- what's the best way to update the file when I have a minute to complete
the profile (other than sending it to you)

thank you

PDM

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Paola, your plan for ISTCS is now available in the StratML collection at
> http://xml.gov/stratml/drybridge/index.htm#ISTCS or, more specifically,
> http://xml.gov/stratml/dimaio/ISTCS.xml &
> http://xml.gov/stratml/carmel/ISTCS2wStyle.xml Please note that I made a
> few adjustments in the latter rendition of your plan.  Your goal<http://xml.gov/stratml/carmel/ISTCS2wStyle.xml#_f173517a-2d8b-11e2-a125-b56f5b280d48>should be exciting to many people.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> When Andre has imported your plan into his StratML portal<http://stratml.hyperbase.com/documents.html>,
> his form <http://www.hyperbase.com/xml/cosmos/resource/apps/stratedit.xml>can be used to flesh it out as a performance plan, with designated roles
> and performance indicators.  I trust that he will be happy to have folks
> like you use his portal to post their plans and reports.****
>
> ** **
>
> However, the vision of the StratML standard is:  *A worldwide web of
> intentions, stakeholders, and results* … meaning that folks should be
> free to post their plans and reports wherever they choose on the public
> Web.  Service providers should compete for the privilege not only to host
> StratML formatted plans and reports but also to make the information and
> data they contain readily usable and useful to stakeholders.  MarkLogic,
> for example, is redeveloping their StratML search service.
> http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm#MarkLogic ****
>
> ** **
>
> BTW, while I was at it, I also converted ISTCS’s somewhat more formal
> about us statement, at http://xml.gov/stratml/carmel/ISTCSwStyle.xml ****
>
> ** **
>
> Owen****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* paoladimaio10@gmail.com [mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Paola Di Maio
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:10 AM
> *To:* eGov IG (Public)
> *Subject:* Fwd: Tools for eGovernance****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> From: *Paola Di Maio* <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Tools for eGovernance
> To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Owen****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> Paola, don’t get me started on the term “governance” … which all-too-often
> implies trying to gain the upper hand, politically speaking, to force **
> others** to do things, rather than focusing on that which we could and
> should do for ourselves, in partnership with those who share not only our
> values but also our objectives.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you for the reminder that this group is still not started taking
> steps (unless I missed it) toward creating a shared definition for
> egovernance (see previous emails). Not sure if the members of the group
> have been surveyed yet to see what definition would work for them etc. (but
> we had some exhcnages on this list to that effect) ****
>
>  ****
>
> BTW, it is good to see that you have documented a mission and personal
> goal at http://personal.strath.ac.uk/paola.dimaio/  Imagine what might be
> accomplished if multitudes of people were to document not only their
> longer-term goals but also their near-term objectives on the Web in an **open,
> standard, machine-readable format** like StratML.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank yo for the prompt****
>
> I have gone to STRATHML creator and created a test file to start with-****
>
> is there  a directory of strathml files I can load to>****
>
> ** **
>
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5XeDqbLLqHSQWpDdnFfLUdkbWs/edit****
>
> ** **
>
> cheers****
>
> ** **
>
> PDM****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> Owen Ambur****
>
> Co-Chair, AIIM StratML <http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm> Committee****
>
> Co-Chair Emeritus, xml.gov CoP****
>
> Communications/Membership Director, FIRM<http://firmcouncil.org/index.htm>
> ****
>
> Former Project Manager, ET.gov <http://et.gov/>****
>
> Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG<http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=42481&public=1>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Holm, Jeanne M (1760) [mailto:jeanne.m.holm@jpl.nasa.gov]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 12, 2012 6:30 AM
> *To:* Tim Davies; paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
> *Cc:* eGov IG (Public)****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Tools for eGovernance****
>
>  ****
>
> Paola and Tim--****
>
>  ****
>
> It is less about which tools can and could be used (there are many), than
> about the policies of the bodies which govern and convene the meetings.  My
> understanding is that the W3C has good reasons why they do not actually
> record or make recordable the verbal discussions and broadcasts from the
> meetings.  For this group, therefore, I abide by those rules.****
>
>  ****
>
> However, there could certainly be an interesting discussion on the list
> and in our meetings on how best to accomplish (or what ways we could
> accomplish) the easiest participation in such activities if policies were
> changed or for groups where the policies are different.****
>
>  ****
>
> --Jeanne****
>
>
> **********************************************************
> Jeanne Holm
> Evangelist, Data.gov
> U.S. General Services Administration****
>
> Cell: (818) 434-5037
> Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn: JeanneHolm
> **************************************************************
>
>  ****
>
> *From: *Tim Davies <tim@practicalparticipation.co.uk>
> *Date: *Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:18:10 +0000
> *To: *<paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
> *Cc: *"eGov IG (Public)" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Tools for eGovernance
> *Resent-From: *<public-egov-ig@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:18:59 +0000****
>
>  ****
>
> Just a quick pointer to an interesting Working Draft from the IETF on
> Remote Participation: ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-genarea-rps-reqs/?include_text=1
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> As IETF highlight, and as is mirrored by my experience last week trying to
> remote participate in the Internet Governance Forum, which has also worked
> hard to support remote panelists and participation, the right mix of tools
> and practices to support remote participation in face-to-face meetings, and
> effective cross-platform online-only meetings, currently still seem
> somewhat elusive. ****
>
>  ****
>
> There has been the suggestion in past Internet Governance Forum
> discussions on Remote Participation that it would be good to have a shared
> project between a number of conferences / fora which have a governance
> function to develop shared tools, principles and guidance for
> e-Participation in meetings - but as yet nothing has come of this. Perhaps
> it's something that could have connections to the eGov meeting.****
>
>  ****
>
> All the best****
>
>  ****
>
> Tim****
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> just a quick household note ****
>
>  ****
>
> I may have asked this before, apologies for repetition****
>
>  ****
>
> I find it hard to understand why the calls are not broadcast using some
> webex type application****
>
> ( anymeeting.com  is free and works well and there are others)****
>
>  ****
>
> While when I am based at the office I have free calls to most countries
> and can easily spend hours on the phone****
>
> without breaking the budget for this effort however when I travel (which
> in the last few months has been a constant and it is likely to get worse)*
> ***
>
> it's difficult, expensive and not always possible to get on the phone long
> distance.****
>
>  ****
>
> This means I cannot volunteer to scribe (I am sure it would be my turn at
> some point)****
>
>  ****
>
> I must say that I have the same observation for other similar events, for
> example I could not attend in person****
>
> yesterday the #sw2022 session at #iswc2012 ,  so sorry I am missing the
> opportunity to meet in person so many of you!!****
>
>  ****
>
> Slides****
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/PaolaDIM/sw10-yearslides****
>
> Voiceover****
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9bqBBJNIF4&list=UUcxJu04fCSkU9x1e7BwYYHQ&index=2&feature=plcp
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> I would have expected a virtual connection to present remotely and take
> part in the panel discussion remotely, but apparently this was not even
> contemplated by the organisers****
>
>  ****
>
> the bottom line is: how can we eGovern ourselves, without adopting the
> necessary eGovernance tools?****
>
>  ****
>
> This brings up another possible topic for discussion, 'Principles and
> Tools  for eGovernance' (sine qua non)****
>
>  ****
>
> I d love to present a topic or two, and to scribe, when the facilities are
> available****
>
>  ****
>
> In the meantime, keep it growing :-)****
>
>  ****
>
> Cheers****
>
>  ****
>
> PDM****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> --
>
>
> http://www.timdavies.org.uk
> 07834 856 303.
> @timdavies
>
> Co-director of Practical Participation:
> http://www.practicalparticipation.co.uk
> --------------------------
> Practical Participation Ltd is a registered company in England and Wales -
> #5381958. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>