RE: structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]

Hi Oscar,

I see that the "Seamless Integration of Data" Task Force has already taken off with the inclusion of the very interesting STRATML specifications. Well done!
Two issues:
I attach here a paper we wrote some years ago that proposes a kind of a strategic model for public sector organizations. I am not sure if this can be of usage at this stage for STRAML but I think it is at least relevant (e.g. see figure 4 for a strategic model).
Another direction that I see interesting for this TF is the idea of a common approach for describing in a generic fashion a public administration service model. This would have certain benefits in a SOA environment that then could use these common descriptions for facilitating discovery, composition, invocation, etc of public services. Several attempts both from researchers and governments have already taken place towards this direction (e.g. GOVML, GEA, GCIM). If you are interested in this direction I could provide further information, and references.
As at 15:00 CET tomorrow I will be just landing returning back from a trip, I expect to join the conf with some delay at around 15:40 CET.

Best regards,
Vassilios
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Oscar Azañon Esteire
Sent: 04 July 2008 14:26
To: public-egov-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: structuring the wiki [was: Re: XBC use cases]


Hi all,

 I have uploaded a first proposal for an Use Case Template to the wiki (http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_Template). Please feel free to add/delete/modify anything directly (I believe we should all have the appropriate permissions). If anyone prefers that we discuss things internally on the list rather than on the Wiki directly, please let me know and we can have a look at that too - in this case i'd say the wiki is a nice tool for this but you may think different.

 The items of information have grown a little bit from 'name' and 'description'. I have uploaded an introducion on why more information is needed - for instance, we need to assess a given use case in terms of the impact it can have on people, public administrations, implementation feasibility, related initiatives/standards, etc. This is open ground for discussion and I'm really looking forward to get your point of view.

 BTW - if anyone has already identified any use case, please do not heasitate to post it on the list or directly on the wiki even if unfinished.

 UCs can be posted here: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/Use_Case_Template. 

 cheers!

 ocr


--
Oscar Azañon Esteire
oscarae@princast.es
Tel: 985 10 5997
Tel: 984 39 0628