- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:44 -0500
- To: "'eGov IG'" <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Jose, links to a description of the FEA reference model maintenance process as well as the submission form are provided at http://et.gov/stage4.htm I understand MAX will be used to facilitate consideration of submissions during this revision cycle. A link to MAX is provided at http://et.gov/stage2.htm but access is limited to .gov folks and contractors. ET.gov is a means for other folks to provide input into the process, i.e., to propose additions to the Technical Reference Model (TRM), as explained at http://et.gov/pagehelp.aspx#technicalstandard I will know more after attending a meeting on Tuesday afternoon at which direction will be given on the process for this cycle. Owen -----Original Message----- From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jose M. Alonso Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:54 AM To: Owen Ambur Cc: eGov IG; Kevin Novak Subject: Re: first very rough editor's draft of group note El 11/12/2008, a las 3:42, Owen Ambur escribió: > Jose, you said: "... one of the main Group's goals [is] to make W3C > better > speak in government terms ..." Yes, and it's in the charter: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/eGov/ig-charter#scope > In the U.S., that is the essence of the purpose of the Federal > Enterprise > Architecture (FEA) reference models, i.e., to establish the terms and > categories by which agencies are supposed to consider IT investments: > http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/a-2-EAModelsNEW2.html > > As far as W3C Recommendations are concerned, the FEA Technical > Reference > Model (TRM) is most relevant: http://xml.gov/stratml/crane/FEATRM.xml > > Relatively few of the W3C's Recommendations are currently included > in the > TRM: http://www.xml.gov/draft/W3CRecommendationsFEATRM.pdf Ok. I remember you (maybe someone else) mentioned about this before. Thanks. > Proposed changes to the FEA models are due by January 12 for > consideration > in the FY 2011 budget cycle. What's the rationale and process? I'm copying Kevin since he will probably understand it better than me anyway :) -- Jose > Owen Ambur > Co-Chair Emeritus, xmlCoP > Co-Chair, AIIM StratML Committee > Member, AIIM iECM Committee > Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG > Membership Director, FIRM Board > Former Project Manager, ET.gov > > >
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 03:33:13 UTC