- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:54:09 +0100
- To: "Owen Ambur" <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: eGov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, Kevin Novak <kevinnovak@aia.org>
El 11/12/2008, a las 3:42, Owen Ambur escribió: > Jose, you said: "... one of the main Group's goals [is] to make W3C > better > speak in government terms ..." Yes, and it's in the charter: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/eGov/ig-charter#scope > In the U.S., that is the essence of the purpose of the Federal > Enterprise > Architecture (FEA) reference models, i.e., to establish the terms and > categories by which agencies are supposed to consider IT investments: > http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/a-2-EAModelsNEW2.html > > As far as W3C Recommendations are concerned, the FEA Technical > Reference > Model (TRM) is most relevant: http://xml.gov/stratml/crane/FEATRM.xml > > Relatively few of the W3C's Recommendations are currently included > in the > TRM: http://www.xml.gov/draft/W3CRecommendationsFEATRM.pdf Ok. I remember you (maybe someone else) mentioned about this before. Thanks. > Proposed changes to the FEA models are due by January 12 for > consideration > in the FY 2011 budget cycle. What's the rationale and process? I'm copying Kevin since he will probably understand it better than me anyway :) -- Jose > Owen Ambur > Co-Chair Emeritus, xmlCoP > Co-Chair, AIIM StratML Committee > Member, AIIM iECM Committee > Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG > Membership Director, FIRM Board > Former Project Manager, ET.gov > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 15:56:02 UTC