- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:07:00 -0600
- To: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <OF6BE3B9EA.727A6C31-ON86257D86.0073EBE2-86257D86.0073FF22@us.ibm.com>
Ben, Is it because other people are already using it? Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> Date: 11/04/2014 02:51 PM Subject: RE: Need Agreement on Terminology Two reasons some people don’t like “Intentions”: · http://www.w3.org/TR/web-intents/ · http://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Intent.html From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 12:16 PM To: Ben Peters Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; White, Jason J; Olli Pettay; public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org; Ryosuke Niwa; Travis Leithead Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology I am not quite following why intention based invents is a problem. The events reflect the intent of the user. Rich Schwerdtfeger Inactive hide details for Ben Peters ---11/04/2014 01:18:22 PM---Would Input Events be confusing because we already have those Ben Peters ---11/04/2014 01:18:22 PM---Would Input Events be confusing because we already have those in DOM Events? Travis, Ryosuke- you ha From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com> To: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason J" < jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" < public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> Date: 11/04/2014 01:18 PM Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology Would Input Events be confusing because we already have those in DOM Events? Travis, Ryosuke- you have both expressed a distaste for "Intention", can you elaborate on that here? ________________________________________ From: chaals@yandex-team.ru <chaals@yandex-team.ru> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 10:15 AM To: Ben Peters; White, Jason J; Olli Pettay; public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology 04.11.2014, 18:51, "Ben Peters" <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>: > The question really is should the events be the "Intention" of the user, the "Action" of the browser/site, or the "Command" itself? They represent the intention of the user. (And while I could argue with Olli over the use of device events, input events seems fine to me too). cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 21:07:35 UTC