- From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:35:49 +0200
- To: fabio.paterno@isti.cnr.it, 'Ben Peters' <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
- CC: public-editing-tf@w3.org, public-indie-ui@w3.org
On 11/04/2014 09:51 AM, Fabio Paternò wrote: > You could consider the term “task event” I'd definitely avoid using word 'task', since 'task' has already its reserved meaning in the web platform. -Olli to indicate an event that aims to support the accomplishment of a given logical user activity independent of > the device actually used for it, > > Best > > Fabio > > *Da:*Ben Peters [mailto:Ben.Peters@microsoft.com] > *Inviato:* martedì 4 novembre 2014 01:03 > *A:* public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org > *Oggetto:* Need Agreement on Terminology > > We need to decide what will be the terminology for “Intentions”. So far, I have been calling mouse, keyboard, etc input “Actions” and their events > “Action Events”. What a user is trying to do with them is an “Intention” and their events are “Intention Events”. There has been considerable pushback > though due to “Web Intents” that share the same name and haven’t moved forward recently. So what are your thoughts? We can potentially change “Action > Events” to “Device Events”, and change “Intention Events” to either “Command Events” or “Action Events”. We need to decide though because it’s getting > confusingJ > > Options for Mouse/Keyboard/Touch/Pointer Term: > > ·Action Event: refers to User’s Action. > > ·Device Event: refers to the idea that these are only available on certain devices, which is why we want to discourage their direct use. Might sound > like something lower level than javascript (Windows Messages, for instance) > > Options for beforeInput, beforeSelectionChange Term: > > ·Intention Event: referes to User’s Intention. Possiblly overloaded by Web Intents. > > ·Action Event: refers to the Browser/Site Action. Sounds somewhat generic. > > ·Command Event: refers to the data in the event itself. We are not exactly following the Command design pattern, so this might be slightly confusing too. > > Please provide your thoughts. Thanks! > > https://github.com/w3c/editing-explainer/issues/7 > > Ben >
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 09:36:16 UTC