Re: Small comments on DCAT

Thanks Antoine,

I’ve included a fix for the link and adjusted the text in editorial notes a little in a pr that was tidying a few other broken links/behind the scenes html glitches so no need for the overhead

Dave Browning

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 10:01:14 PM
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Small comments on DCAT

It is ironic that I truncated my mail subject while complaining about truncated notes ;-)

Antoine

On 23/11/2021 22:00, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While reading the latest draft of DCAT, I noticed a couple of small things:
>
> 1. In "Status of this document" and "2. Motivation for change" there are two editors' notes "To be updated". Maybe a more precise wording "This section is to be updated" would look less puzzling. (at the beginning I thought it was the note that had to be updated).
>
> 2. The reference to 1153 in the points to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1364
>
> I'm sorry I'm not creating issues for these, but I feel it may not be worth the overhead...
> In any case this hasn't played a role in my vote, even though it looks like the two editor's notes are to be updated for a while ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>