- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:01:14 +0100
- To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
It is ironic that I truncated my mail subject while complaining about truncated notes ;-) Antoine On 23/11/2021 22:00, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi everyone, > > While reading the latest draft of DCAT, I noticed a couple of small things: > > 1. In "Status of this document" and "2. Motivation for change" there are two editors' notes "To be updated". Maybe a more precise wording "This section is to be updated" would look less puzzling. (at the beginning I thought it was the note that had to be updated). > > 2. The reference to 1153 in the points to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1364 > > I'm sorry I'm not creating issues for these, but I feel it may not be worth the overhead... > In any case this hasn't played a role in my vote, even though it looks like the two editor's notes are to be updated for a while ;-) > > Cheers, > > Antoine >
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2021 21:01:54 UTC