Re: Small comments on DCAT

Thanks, Dave!

Antoine

On 24/11/2021 08:14, David Browning wrote:
> Thanks Antoine,
> 
> I’ve included a fix for the link and adjusted the text in editorial notes a little in a pr that was tidying a few other broken links/behind the scenes html glitches so no need for the overhead
> 
> Dave Browning
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 23, 2021 10:01:14 PM
> *To:* public-dxwg-wg@w3.org <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Small comments on DCAT
> It is ironic that I truncated my mail subject while complaining about truncated notes ;-)
> 
> Antoine
> 
> On 23/11/2021 22:00, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> While reading the latest draft of DCAT, I noticed a couple of small things:
>> 
>> 1. In "Status of this document" and "2. Motivation for change" there are two editors' notes "To be updated". Maybe a more precise wording "This section is to be updated" would look less puzzling. (at the beginning I thought it was the note that had to be  updated).
>> 
>> 2. The reference to 1153 in the points to https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1364

>> 
>> I'm sorry I'm not creating issues for these, but I feel it may not be worth the overhead...
>> In any case this hasn't played a role in my vote, even though it looks like the two editor's notes are to be updated for a while ;-)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Antoine
>> 
>

Received on Thursday, 25 November 2021 08:28:28 UTC