- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:17:10 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@davebrowning, are you referring to the notes saying when the terms were added? I was thinking to leave them. Because I guess these notes might help in different situations, e.g., when trying to understand with what version a dataset is compliant. I've noticed that some of these notes also explain why the term was added and not only when. I would be keen to keep also those as, in my opinion, they help to understand the context of the choice we made and the context is often useful to better use of the standard. As for things we might consider reviewing, the section 6.1 RDF representation is not very aligned with dcat 3. -Do we want to add a note saying "a new RDF will be made available for DCAT 3 as soon as the vocabulary is finalized"? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1433#issuecomment-990925061 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 December 2021 12:17:12 UTC