- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:03:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Trying to summarise the results of the discussion in this thread, and outlining possible actions: 1. Improve the definition of `dcat:bbox` & `dcat:centroid`: @JoepvanGenuchten , @bertvannuffelen , thanks for highlighting the ambiguity of the term "resource" in the current definition of these properties. We'll discuss this issue in one of the next DCAT meetings. 2. Re-use reference vocabularies for use cases where DCAT spatial properties are not enough: The new version of GeoSPARQL can do the job, also because it addresses those gaps that led to the definition of spatial properties in the DCAT namespace. About point (2), there's of course the issue of having two alternative ways to specify the same information, which does not help interoperability. However, this might be mitigated by defining mappings, as explained by @dr-shorthair . @JoepvanGenuchten , @bertvannuffelen , are you happy with this summary? Is there anything I left out? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1392#issuecomment-907498910 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 27 August 2021 22:03:14 UTC