- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:01:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair I would say that problems of inconsistencies and testing difficulties are related to the criteria of trustworthiness. In the case of ADMS, I see no problems with things like stability and persistence (stuff in W3C namespaces are guaranteed to survive as long as W3C is around and probably even longer). But, even if I was part of the team that developed ADMS, I am not trying to 'sell' it to the group, just trying to find out why we wouldn't use properties that are readily available and seem to be doing exactly what we need. I am not sure how to measure 'tolerance of developers'. Are you saying there is a risk they'll turn away if DCAT incorporates properties from other namespaces, or just one more namespace? Doesn't that invalidate the whole idea of reusing or mixing and matching namespaces? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-634613256 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 12:01:36 UTC