Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)

Thanks @rawmatt you are strictly correct of course. This was loose language. The intention is merely to draw attention to properties associated with the super-class (through either global domain-range constraints, or local restrictions) which would therefore also be associated with sub-classes. 

Would it be OK to write "The following properties associated with the super-class are also available for use."?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1228#issuecomment-606214025 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 30 March 2020 20:00:27 UTC