Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)

Yes, that would be OK.

How about: "The following properties of the super-class are also available for use." I suggest this because "associated" is undefined, and is also OOP terminology. "Of" is such plain English that I don't think it could be taken as implying anything extra.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rawmatt
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1228#issuecomment-606221515 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 30 March 2020 20:12:55 UTC