- From: <lars.svensson@web.de>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:05:59 +0200
- To: "DXWG WG List" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, Thanks for giving us editors of conneg-by-ap another 24 hours to fix open issues with the document. We have addressed the following: 1. The syntax for Accept-Profile now uses angle brackets around the URIs in order to cleanly separate the profile URI from q-values, other parameters or other profile URIs [0,1]. This resolves Rob Sanderson's first objection. A question has been sent to Rob if he is satisfied with the outcome [2] and he has confirmed this [3]. 2. The three issues that were still in the document have been removed since they were either closed already (#1041) or had been resolved but not closed (#290) or resolved but without any response from the original poster over four weeks (#678). This resolves Rob Sanderson's second objection. A question has been sent to Rob if he is satisfied with the outcome [2] and he has confirmed this [3]. 3. The document now contains a definition of "functional profile" in the definition section [4] while all other text about functional profiles is now in its own section in ยง7 [5,6]. This resolves #1022 [7]. What we have not been able to address is the question about order of precedence for conflicting profile negotiation situations (#505)[8]. My understanding is that Annette requires that QSA is made non-normative while Nick and Rob are not willing to step down from a full standard. I have asked Annette if this issue is a blocker for her [8]. Regarding wide review, Peter had sent out a request for comments on the 2PWD [9]. Following that, we've had responses on the comments list and outside Github comments from at least Kam Hay Fung [10,11,17], Erik Wilde [12], Herbert van der Sompel [13], Andreas Kuckartz [14] and Gregg Kellogg [15, resolved in 16]. Following a request from Nick [18], we also had feedback from CKAN developers [19,20]. This shows involvement of the outside community. I have also added this to the transition request document [21]. With five hours left, there is little left for us editors to do, except to ask you to cast your votes again. The editors of conneg-by-ap Nick, Rob and Lars [0] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#http-getresourcebyprofile [1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#eg-http-get [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/0914.html [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/0915.html [4] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#definitions and https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/larsgsvensson-functional-specification/conneg-by-ap/index.html#definitions [5] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#functional-profiles-definition [6] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#conformance-profiles [7] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1022 [8] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/att-0913/00-part [9] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019May/0002.html [10] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/785 [11] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/835 [12] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/501#issuecomment-522503214 [13] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/501#issuecomment-522523315 [14] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/290#issuecomment-466656384 [15] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/662 [16] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Apr/0001.html [17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Aug/0002.html [18] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/att-0907/00-part [19] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/att-0908/00-part [20] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Sep/att-0910/00-part [21] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Conneg:-Draft-Transition-Request-to-CR
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2019 17:06:23 UTC