- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:06:17 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2019 00:06:44 UTC
Looking back at my big edit on that section, I did say "Unlike the HTTP-header realization, which is also the subject of an independent IETF document [PROF-IETF], this realization is fully specified here, though it is not normative." I thought we had agreed that the QSA realization was not to be normative. There was general approval to my edits when I submitted them, except that Nick wanted to keep the original heading, as I recall. On 9/24/19 2:54 PM, Karen Coyle via GitHub wrote: > @agreiner Trying to understand your comment - was it marked as > non-normative in earlier drafts? Was there an agreement that this > section would be non-normative? Thanks. > -- Annette Greiner (she) NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2019 00:06:44 UTC