W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2019

Re: [dxwg] Prof 3 pwd candidate (#1074)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:21:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-531851300-1568650911-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@aisaac the Requirements Appendix was meant to be a list of Requirements & responses to them, see https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof/#requirements. However, we didn't use that approach much preferring instead to place Issues in the doc and deal with their implications via PRs. So the Requirements listing was just a method that was outside of our editing processes. 

For the Requirements that were directly from the UCR, we listed them elsewhere: https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof/#motivating-requirements.

I think we should go back and check off against UCR requirements, especially to check what Guidance need not do, but we just don't need the listing as we had it in this appendix in 2PWD.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1074#issuecomment-531851300 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 16 September 2019 16:21:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:20 UTC