Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)

@nicholascar no please let's not have the discussion on the naming of ResourceDescriptor here!
My original issue was about changing textual definitions for elements, which do not include ResourceDescriptor. And there's a perfectly valid issue (#573) for discussing this, we should end the discussion there.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1061#issuecomment-531814168 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 16 September 2019 14:54:29 UTC