W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2019

Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:08:15 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-531162349-1568365693-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@rob-metalinkage I think for constraints we don't need to take into account IETF RFC 2119 yet. My suggestion is quite basic. It's only about consistency with the definition we agreed on. #1070 can be discussed later as it looks like it's about questioning again the agreed definition.
It's a bit the same for #1072 : whatever be our decision there, the next PWD needs to have the definition we've agreed on as main reference. (I've got further arguments but I'll put them in #1072)

@makxdekkers for hasResource @kcoyle started from my suggestion, which is indeed not the one in the current document.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1061#issuecomment-531162349 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 13 September 2019 09:08:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:20 UTC