Re: [dxwg] Indicate / explain dagram formalisms (#697)

@nicholascar Thanks for following this up. I agree that the diagrams are improved, in the sense that I can follow them and believe that I understand what they are trying to convey in general.

Note: this is not an endorsement of the model - this comment refers to the *notation* used.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by paulwalk
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/697#issuecomment-529214860 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 8 September 2019 15:44:16 UTC