Simon
Would https://www.go-fair.org/ be a better reference than the Force11 site?
P
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 07:50, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
wrote:
> One small detail on the proposed charter:
>
> In section 2.1 the charter refers to 'FORCE 11’s FAIR Principles'
> While the publication of the FAIR Principles on FORCE 11's website is a
> commonly used reference, Force 11 was only one of the organizations
> involved in the development and promulgation of FAIR. FORCE 11 does not own
> FAIR, so it is misleading to imply it by denoting it in this way, and
> disrespectful to the other organizations that were involved (e.g. CODATA).
> Better to say 'The research data community's FAIR Principles' or just 'The
> FAIR Principles'.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> Sent: Saturday, 5 October, 2019 17:49
> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org; team-dxwg-chairs@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda, October 8 - !re-charter!
>
> All, the agenda for October 8 is here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.10.08
>
> Other than updates on DCAT and Conneg progress, we have the question of
> re-chartering the group. There is a draft of the new charter here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.10.08
>
> It is VERY close to the original charter, as we were advised by Philippe
> that would be the easiest route. We will definitely get and apply any edits
> that he suggests, and we'll let you know what those are.
>
> The chairs.
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> skype: kcoylenet
>
>