- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 20:22:09 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair said: > Since most of the rec is written in terms of 'recommended for use ...' probably the only really normative elements are the descriptions of the existence of classes and properties. 7-14 are all good illustrations of usage, best practice etc. I guess that makes them non-normative, which only leaves chapter 6 and the conformance chapter as normative - is that what we intend? Makes sense to me. But I would keep normative also Section 3 (Namespaces). Not sure about Section 15 (Security and privacy). About Section A (Acknowledgments) and Section D (Change history), I don't think there's a need to mark them explicitly as "informative". -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/922#issuecomment-491541084 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2019 20:22:12 UTC