W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2019

Re: [dxwg] [I18N] Various date types could be more specific (#957)

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:21:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-505897542-1561558912-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The point of not being bound to a specific date/time datatype is that information as dataset release / modified date are expressed with different levels of precision by different communities / tools. Some are using a date (`xsd:date`), others a date-time (`xsd:dateTime`), others just the year (`xsd:gYear`).

About processing issues, I don't think this should be the case if the literal is typed.

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/957#issuecomment-505897542 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2019 14:21:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:30 UTC