Ok but then you are moving the issue on the users' side aren't you? From the point of view of the interoperability I am not sure whether this solution would make things easier as it might encourage mix and match and proliferation of application profiles. E.g. when it comes to express `name` which vocabulary should I use `foaf:name` or `vcard:name` or both? Why not simplify and have just one choice that represents the concept of Agent with contact point as one of its attributes? -- GitHub Notification of comment by ltrani Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/955#issuecomment-505608788 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 25 June 2019 20:26:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:30 UTC