- From: ltrani via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:26:01 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Ok but then you are moving the issue on the users' side aren't you? From the point of view of the interoperability I am not sure whether this solution would make things easier as it might encourage mix and match and proliferation of application profiles. E.g. when it comes to express `name` which vocabulary should I use `foaf:name` or `vcard:name` or both? Why not simplify and have just one choice that represents the concept of Agent with contact point as one of its attributes? -- GitHub Notification of comment by ltrani Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/955#issuecomment-505608788 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2019 20:26:02 UTC