W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Range of dct:type (#1009)

From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:13:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-513175782-1563531232-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@wood-chris Apparently, my post wasn't really helpful because your conclusion was completely contrary to what I tried to argue. "CD" would not be a `dct:type` but would be a `dct:format`. The example of a type "Book" that I mentioned, is not a format; its format would be "Hardcover" or "paperback" or "ePub".
The property `dct:type` refers to the _kind of thing_ the resource is. As far as I can see, the example of the types in the list at https://publications.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/at-concept-scheme/-/resource/authority/resource-type/ might make this clearer -- or would you consider those types of legal resources formats? 
As to your example of genres in music, I don't have experience in that domain, but it seems to me that on a high level , the `dct:type` of music in general would be `dcmitype:Sound`, and if you have a more specific type list it could be foo:ClassicalMusic, foo:PopMusic, etc etc., so the kind of music -- to whatever level of detail your list supports.
As to the organic evolution, I don't think there has been any: the DCMI terms (the set of properties) and the DCMI types (the list of 12 resource types) have been stable for almost two decades.

GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1009#issuecomment-513175782 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 19 July 2019 10:13:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC