- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:55:16 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> I suspect that rdfs:comment(s) were used in the previous version of dcat and we have mostly inherited their usage, while skos:definition(s) have been added for terms defined dcat2. > > AFAIK, skos:definition is not a sub-property of rdfs:comment, so If we want to be back compatible with the systems that already exploit rdf:comments in their GUI, I see the following possibilities: > A- turning all the skos:definition in rdfs:comment > B- use both for all the terms > > is there any objection if we implement the solution A? any other ideas? @akuckartz seems to dislike Solution A, we might still choose between B- use both skos:definition and rdfs:comment for all the terms C- replacing all the rdfs:comment in skos:definition (losing back-compatibility with systems that expect rdfs:comments as in dcat 1.0) Any preference? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/983#issuecomment-511436756 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 July 2019 14:55:17 UTC