- From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:25:20 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac I would be fine with giving ourselves slack on names if it weren't that the primary statement that is made in the definition is "A named set ...." That's pretty definitive. If the definition read "A set ..." and in the document we talked about optional and preferred naming, I would feel better about it. But the definition opens with "named" in a way that would make later "slack" very hard to pull off. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-509712199 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2019 16:25:21 UTC