W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:22:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-509711329-1562689372-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Copying email comments to github (my bad)

Karen said:

>What is meant by "named"? Is a name the same as an identifier? The same
as a title on a document?

>Note that we have stated that for content negotiation the resource MUST
have a web-based identifier (URI/IRI). When a profile is a document
(e.g. PDF) then I would say that it SHOULD have an identifier, but if it
doesn't it does not cease to be a profile.

Antoine replied:

>I think at the level of a definition we can give ourselves a bit of slack, and only refine later (i.e. in our guidance document) what are the possible "names" or identifiers and what level of mandatoriness we expect.

>By the way I think what you outline in the second paragraph does not conflict with what is in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiles/ (either as rather clean text or very drafty notes).

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-509711329 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2019 16:22:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC