W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] dcat:Resource description edits, section 5.1 (#966)

From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 22:18:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-507446027-1562019532-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
 @andrea-perego wrote:
> @riccardoAlbertoni , saying that a dcat:Resource is a "metadata record", implies that dcat:Resource is a subclass of dcat:CatalogRecord, which is not the case.

 I am afraid that I don't see the implication about subclassing that you are mentioning, as in my mind not all the metadata record are catalogRecord.
 CatalogRecord is a specific metadata record for an entry in the catalog (..it is the metadata record of a metadata record .. ),  but aren't dcat:Dataset and dcat:dataService metadata records for the actual datasets and services? 

My apologies if I have forgotten any previous discussion on that point,  but I was assuming that when we use the expression "metadata record" in 
>dcat:Catalog represents a catalog, which is a dataset in which each individual item is a metadata record describing some resource; the scope of dcat:Catalog is collections of metadata about datasets or data services. 
we were referring to all the kinds of metadata records.
That also because in a dataset representing a catalog  I would include all the above. 

If I am wrong and the intended meaning was "metadata record" = "dcat:CatalogRecord", 
in order to avoid that others might get confused as I am, I suggest replacing "metadata record" with dcat:CatalogRecord,  as we use "metadata record" in the document only once, in the sentence above.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/966#issuecomment-507446027 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 1 July 2019 22:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:54 UTC