- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 22:18:53 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@andrea-perego wrote: > @riccardoAlbertoni , saying that a dcat:Resource is a "metadata record", implies that dcat:Resource is a subclass of dcat:CatalogRecord, which is not the case. I am afraid that I don't see the implication about subclassing that you are mentioning, as in my mind not all the metadata record are catalogRecord. CatalogRecord is a specific metadata record for an entry in the catalog (..it is the metadata record of a metadata record .. ), but aren't dcat:Dataset and dcat:dataService metadata records for the actual datasets and services? My apologies if I have forgotten any previous discussion on that point, but I was assuming that when we use the expression "metadata record" in >dcat:Catalog represents a catalog, which is a dataset in which each individual item is a metadata record describing some resource; the scope of dcat:Catalog is collections of metadata about datasets or data services. we were referring to all the kinds of metadata records. That also because in a dataset representing a catalog I would include all the above. If I am wrong and the intended meaning was "metadata record" = "dcat:CatalogRecord", in order to avoid that others might get confused as I am, I suggest replacing "metadata record" with dcat:CatalogRecord, as we use "metadata record" in the document only once, in the sentence above. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/966#issuecomment-507446027 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 1 July 2019 22:18:55 UTC