W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2018

Re: [dxwg] Distribution definition [RDIDF]

From: Annette Greiner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:25:13 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-424130524-1537824312-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I don't disagree with the text here, but I think it worth pointing out that it is a bit paradoxical with respect to what some of us have been asserting with regard to profile negotiation.
"The definition text of dcat:Distribution has been revised to clarify that distributions are primarily representations of datasets. As such, all distributions of a given dataset should be informationally equivalent. " Here, it is assumed that representations of a dataset are informationally equivalent, but profile negotiation would return datasets that are not informationally equivalent, because different profiles may include different subsets of the dataset. My preference is to keep distributions informationally equivalent and ask ourselves if there is a way to make it clear that profile negotiation does not deliver informationally equivalent responses.

GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/52#issuecomment-424130524 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 24 September 2018 21:25:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC