Re: [dxwg] Distribution definition [RDIDF]

Narrowing the scope, as proposed, breaks backwards compatibility with existing DCAT implementations.

Services that support queries against a dataset are never "informationally equivalent

If this restricted view is held, then any distrubution that supports accessing a file remotely, is by definiton not a dcat:Distribution but a dcat:SistributonService.  Just basic web architecture of allowing a HTTP HEAD request is sufficient to break information equivalence, and content negotiation over langauge or mime type also does. Different formats are not informationally equivalent - for example a CSV file loses relationships between attributes compared to complex properties:

id,value1, units1, value2,units2
1, 2.3, "m/s",6.7,"kg"

{ id: 1 ;
   value1: {  value: 2.3 ; units "m/s" ; }
  value2: { value: 6.7 ; units "kg" ; 

CSV holds less information because value1 and units1 need further out-of-band to be related to each other.

So - unless you can come with a robust statement about testability of information equivalence, it strikes me as a slippery slope with no huge value. 

OTOH Making an explicit statement that Distributions may not be informationally equivalent seems quite valuable, and makes services equivalent with distributions logically consistent

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 24 September 2018 21:55:49 UTC