- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:07:47 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
OK - fair enough. A `dct:Standard` is not _necessarily_ a `dcat:Resource` - at least it is not until it has been added to a `dcat:Catalog` somewhere ☺ Of course the same applies to a `profdesc:Profile`. So strictly I think we should have something like this  This separates the DCAT concerns (which are about cataloguing) and the Profile concerns (which are about standards). Of course it is not necessary to axiomatize the `dcat:Catalogued*` classes directly, just give the catalogued resources both types e.g. ``` my:StandardABC rdf:type dcat:Resource ; rdf:type dct:Standard . ``` Thinking about how this all relates to ADMS you might go to  Not sure how much of this we would want to follow through with. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/279#issuecomment-417969642 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 September 2018 00:07:48 UTC