I am a little nervous about these 'coathanger' classes, `dcat:Resource` and `dcat:Representation`. These are things that people aren't supposed to use, right? They are just for convenience in the specification, so that we don't have to repeat properties that are common for the subclasses. However, it would be perfectly valid -- although we could include notes to discourage such use -- for an implementation to describe everything in the catalogue as `dcat:Resource` with `dcat:Representation`. Aren't we not 'dumbing down' DCAT this way? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-417946226 using your GitHub accountReceived on Sunday, 2 September 2018 17:29:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC