Thanks! I left notes on explorations so far in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/251#issuecomment-433386589 On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 13:33, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote: > Thanks, Dan. > > > > The SPARQL queries we have defined are on GH: > > > > https://github.com/ec-jrc/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/tree/master/sparql > > > > Documentation of the mappings is available at: > > > > https://ec-jrc.github.io/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/ > > > > Andrea > > > ---- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > European Commission DG JRC > Directorate B - Growth and Innovation > Unit B6 - Digital Economy > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Dan Brickley [danbri@google.com] > *Sent:* 25 October 2018 18:01 > *To:* Dataset Exchange Working Group > *Cc:* Eric Prud'hommeaux > *Subject:* Python notebook scratchpad towards mapping a schema.org > dataset description into DCAT > > > Following today's discussion, and guided by Simon's term level mappings, > I've set up a quick Python notebook on Google Colab using rdflib and > sparql, which explores use of SPARQL CONSTRUCT to map the scheme flavour > into something like DCAT. > > It works with a very basic core, but I haven't figured out what can be > done around options (e.g. mapping schema:license to dct:license and what > happens if that term isn't used...). Should it be one complex query or > several of them, ... or look to other mechanisms like shex mappings instead? > > https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1FKoN3HR69vqVN3fVH36E3MRkB7wSXGEt > has all I've managed so far, feedback/edits welcomed... > > Dan >Received on Friday, 26 October 2018 12:42:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:25 UTC