- From: <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:33:05 +0000
- To: <danbri@google.com>, <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- CC: <eric@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EDFF15E839F79242AA55B1468C63DDA90FD225CC@S-DC-ESTG02-J.net1.cec.eu.int>
Thanks, Dan. The SPARQL queries we have defined are on GH: https://github.com/ec-jrc/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/tree/master/sparql Documentation of the mappings is available at: https://ec-jrc.github.io/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/ Andrea ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. ________________________________ From: Dan Brickley [danbri@google.com] Sent: 25 October 2018 18:01 To: Dataset Exchange Working Group Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux Subject: Python notebook scratchpad towards mapping a schema.org dataset description into DCAT Following today's discussion, and guided by Simon's term level mappings, I've set up a quick Python notebook on Google Colab using rdflib and sparql, which explores use of SPARQL CONSTRUCT to map the scheme flavour into something like DCAT. It works with a very basic core, but I haven't figured out what can be done around options (e.g. mapping schema:license to dct:license and what happens if that term isn't used...). Should it be one complex query or several of them, ... or look to other mechanisms like shex mappings instead? https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1FKoN3HR69vqVN3fVH36E3MRkB7wSXGEt has all I've managed so far, feedback/edits welcomed... Dan
Received on Friday, 26 October 2018 11:33:32 UTC