- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:34:22 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Nick, all First I certainly won't be able to attend the call as I'm traveling, sorry for that... So I'm going to write a couple of quick reaction on the agenda items (using the updated agenda now on the wiki, not the one in the original mail): > Propose submission of guidance doc to Plenary for FPWD approval -1 . I've already said that I'm reluctant to moving anything to FPWD until we've cleaned our act on the requirements. I don't want us/you to spend time to answer comments about 'potential misalignments' which we know are being working on. I also feel that we've got not enough matter and it is still too much in flux to present for a public review. We're on a good track, but I sense that with the current rhythm is going to radically alter the draft. Especially with the F2F coming where I expect we'll add/fix a lot of things. FPWD are open for comments for quite a long time (a couple of months maybe?), it won't be good if we receive many comments on a version that will be soon outdated. And I don't see the point in having the group spend a lot of efforts for triggering comments on an outdated document. > Review Guidance doc content generation in other places > > Google Doc > GitHub Issues > Very good move! In fact I believe that a FPWD shouldn't happen before at least two weeks after the completion of such an agenda item. It is typically going to create more work to add to a draft... > Review GitHub issues presentation in Doc > > Currently issues with long Descriptions hog space. Can we replace such issues with ones with shorter descriptions? In the medium term why not. But for the moment I feel that we should rather spend on time trying to solve some of them - and actually having a good description of them in the draft helps, as many of them are very fresh and still of a manageable size. Cheers, Antoine Antoine On 16/10/2018 09:27, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote: > https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:ProfGui-Telecon2018.10.17 > > Main items: > - Propose submission of guidance doc to Plenary for FPWD approval > - Review Guidance doc content generation in other places > - Review GitHub issues presentation in Doc > > Nick >
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2018 19:34:48 UTC