Re: [dxwg] Confusion between major classes as newly defined in DCAT

I agree with Makx's remark
>  it is essential to consider the definition of a term in a particular context and not what someone would think that a term means. 
and I strongly believe that users must read definitions and shouldn't solely rely on the class name.

However, I have also had the impression the dcat:resource is a quite confusing name. As a matter of fact,  in the document, the paragraph related to dcat:Resource is titled as ["Catalogued Resource"](  

 I suspect we'd better use dcat:CataloguedResource instead of just dcat:Resource.  That would clarify that the class indicates anything which can be catalogued and not any kind of thing as in the case of rdfs:Resource.

@agreiner Would this make a little bit clearer what we mean with resource in DCAT? At least it would explain why dcat:CataloguedResource does't include dcat:Distribution as subclass?

GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 15:02:36 UTC