Re: [dxwg] Defining validation

We definitely include constraints expressed in non-actionable documents, but we should recommend that as far as possible constraints are written in a formalism that allows validation activities to be formed.
e.g. DCAT-AP has a partial SHACL implementation *non-normative I believe*.  All constraints should  be testable - even if it is manual inspection. So constraints SHOULD be expressed as validation rules is perhaps as much as we can say,

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 11:53:21 UTC