W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > October 2018

Re: [dxwg] Defining validation

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 11:53:19 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-428163162-1539085998-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
We definitely include constraints expressed in non-actionable documents, but we should recommend that as far as possible constraints are written in a formalism that allows validation activities to be formed.
e.g. DCAT-AP has a partial SHACL implementation *non-normative I believe*.  All constraints should  be testable - even if it is manual inspection. So constraints SHOULD be expressed as validation rules is perhaps as much as we can say,

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/449#issuecomment-428163162 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 11:53:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:25 UTC