- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:15:36 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I am not sure what would be gained by declaring `prof:hasProfObject` a sub-property of `dct:relation`. In fact, it has been argued by some people at DCMI that `dct:relation` is the implicit super-property of any predicate -- as every predicate defines a relationship between a Subject and an Object, but that tells you basically nothing. I do not fully understand how one would assert as Role on a `dct:relation`. The basic pattern is `:Something dct:relation :SomethingElse` Where would the Role go? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/573#issuecomment-440396728 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2018 19:15:38 UTC