- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:06:43 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@kcoyle I was only questioning the first part of the sentence, about the Prof ontology! And now I'm not sure I was arguing about removing the general 'profile' flavor of the requirement in my own comment (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/274#issuecomment-438472878). The more I think of it, and the more I wonder about this being a key requirement for many things we do in DXWG. It underpins the needs for negotiation, but also the need for profile-specific distributions of DCAT. In fact it underpins the very notion of profile... I'm fairly sure I'd like to have a sentence like this in the profile guidance doc, if it's not already there. This is not simple :-) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/274#issuecomment-439804216 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 November 2018 08:06:57 UTC