Re: [dxwg] UML diagram

Renaming the metadata carrier for implementing artefacts (now
ResourceDescriptor) has been raised multiple times over the last 6 months,
so its great we are finally having a discussion.

I dont have a position other than requirement for naming accuracy against
the required scope. I.e.  the use cases include resources such as
specification documents, primers and guidance notes.. so 'rules' is a role,
not a overarching class description for such things.

Also a pdf document cant be given a dct:conformsTo predicate.. only its
description can.. hence 'descriptor' .. but this is usually redundant..
dcat:Dataset is not a dataset .. its a cataloguable descriptor.  But
'Resource' is probably a bad idea...

Maybe 'Implementation'  is the better choice.



On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, 05:58 aisaac <notifications@github.com wrote:

> I too have plenty comments on the ontology, but I think they will be for
> later. This issue is just about the diagram anyway :-)
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/404#issuecomment-438394478>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIR3YToIo3EaTOqrO4eEDvH_xKTdSjVQks5uuxZvgaJpZM4W2ci6>
> .
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/404#issuecomment-438422958 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 20:22:50 UTC