- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 21:33:06 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I was responding to this in Nick's note: _@kcoyle “...if something like the DCAT-AP PDF can be considered a profile...”_ _According to Profiels Ont it wouldn’t be, it would be the artifact of a Resource Descriptor. See the on point example: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/#eg-dcat-ap_ The question is: is the subject in the following triple coherent with the profilesOnt definition of prof:Profile?: <IRI for DCAT-AP.pdf> <prof:profileOf> <IRI for DCAT specification at W3.org> This follows from the definition of the domain of prof:profileOf as prof:Profile. So I'm trying to clarify what the nature of prof:Profile is because it isn't clear to me, so I was using DCAT-AP as a concrete example. To me, the DCAT-AP specification expressed as it is in the form of a PDF meets the definition in profilesOnt and profgui documents for _profile_. If, however, it does not meet the intended usage in profilesOnt then I think we have a problem with our definition of profile and we need to work to reconcile that. (The definition of prof:Profile does not connect to the definition of prof:ResourceDescriptor, and the diagram at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/#eg-hierarchy doesn't clarify that for me.) (I have other questions about the diagrams, but let's clarify this first.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-435622504 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2018 21:33:08 UTC