- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:11:03 +0000
- To: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2018 11:11:42 UTC
Fwiw, at RDA last week, Tom Baker mentioned that DCMI may revisit some of its domain/range rules in the light of experience. DCMI Usage Board has that responsibility. Dan On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, 00:03 Andrea Perego via GitHub, <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > > I think dct:keyword should remain as is. dct:subject typically refers to > a skos:Concept and enable semantic search and discovery. Making dct:keyword > subproperty of dc:subject will just add confusion. Almost no OWL ontology > uses DC today. They are mostly using DCTerms ontology. > > @fellahst , I agree that the range of `dcat:keyword` (`rdfs:Literal`) > should not be changed, but the statement making it a subproperty of > `dct:subject` is formally incorrect, and it should be marked as an erratum > / deleted. > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/175#issuecomment-375931197 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2018 11:11:42 UTC