Re: [dxwg] Profile Composition and Languages

I also think the level of fields is more granular than we need to worry about - thats more of an API concern. Describing the availability (and usage) of sets of fields is more relevant to make statements about interoperability of data (which is why its more a DCAT issue than a conneg issue, in spite of the word profile appearing...)


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162#issuecomment-399881124 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 25 June 2018 08:57:14 UTC